水分和养分供应对凹凸棒石复配苔藓结皮生长的影响

doi:10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2022.00047

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为了评价生物固沙材料在不同水分和养分供应条件下的应用效果，对沙漠苔藓结皮和含凹凸棒石固沙材料的叶绿素和生长进行了研究。结果表明：人工培养苔藓结皮与固沙材料的最佳配比为1∶1，由接种在沙面上的生物固沙材料的叶绿素a含量、强度和厚度决定。凹凸棒石显著提高了接种生物固沙材料的强度、叶绿素a含量和厚度。3种养分供应方式和3种模拟干旱区的间歇供水方式均能显著提高人工生物型结皮的厚度和强度。50%的养分处理是最佳的养分供应方式。接种生物固沙材料在隔天供水条件下具有较高的厚度和强度。较短的供水和养分供应间歇有利于沙漠生物结皮的生存和繁殖。

关键词: 生物结皮, 高吸水性树脂, 凹凸棒石, 固沙材料, 叶绿素a

Abstract:

The chlorophyll-a and growth of biological sand-fixing materials prepared with desert moss crust and sand-fixing materials added by attapulgite were investigated in order to assess the application effects of biological sand-fixing materials under different water and nutrient supply. The results suggested that the optimal mixture ratio of 1∶1 for cultural moss crust and sand-fixing material was determinate by chlorophyll-a， strength and thickness of biological sand-fixing materials inoculated on the sand surface. Attapulgite clay significantly improved the stronger strength， more chlorophyll-a and thickness of inoculated biological sand-fixing materials. Three methods of nutrient supply and interval water supply based on precipitation in arid region both could significantly promoted the thickness and enhanced the strength， 50% nutrient treatment was considered as the optimal nutrient supply method. The inoculating biological sand-fixing materials performed higher thickness and stronger strength under 1 day interval water supply. More shorter interval water supply and nutrient providing were beneficial to the survival and propagation of desert biological crusts.

Key words: biocrust, superabsorbent, attapulgite, sand-fixing material, chlorophyll-a

中图分类号:

Q948.1

陶玲, 任汉儒, 周怡蕾, 任珺. 水分和养分供应对凹凸棒石复配苔藓结皮生长的影响[J]. 中国沙漠, 2022, 42(6): 288-294.

Ling Tao, Hanru Ren, Yilei Zhou, Jun Ren. Effects of water and nutrient supply on growth of moss crust mixed with attapulgite[J]. Journal of Desert Research, 2022, 42(6): 288-294.

图/表 7

参考文献 35

1	Antoninka A， Bowker M A， Reed S C，et al.Production of greenhouse‐grown biocrust mosses and associated cyanobacteria to rehabilitate dryland soil function［J］.Restoration Ecology，2016，24（3）：324-335.
2	Chiquoine L P， Abella S R， Bowker M A.Rapidly restoring biological soil crusts and ecosystem functions in a severely disturbed desert ecosystem［J］.Ecological Applications：A Publication of the Ecological Society of America，2016，26（4）：1260-1272.
3	Kidron G J.The role of crust thickness in runoff generation from microbiotic crusts［J］.Hydrological Processes，2015，29（7）：1783-1792.
4	Zheng Y P， Xu M， Zhao J C，et al.Effects of inoculated Microcoleus vaginatus on the structure and function of biological soil crusts of desert［J］.Biology and Fertility of Soils，2011，47（4）：473-480.
5	Zhang B C， Zhou X B， Zhang Y M.Responses of microbial activities and soil physical-chemical properties to the successional process of biological soil crusts in the Gurbantunggut Desert，Xingjiang［J］.Journal of Arid Land，2015，7（1）：101-109.
6	Zhang J， Zhang Y M.Diurnal variations of chlorophyll fluorescence and CO₂ exchange of biological soil crusts in different successional stages in the Gurbantunggut Desert of northwestern China［J］.Ecological Research，2014，29（2）：289-298.
7	Zaady E， Katra I， Yizhaq H，et al.Inferring the impact of rainfall gradient on biocrusts’ developmental stage and thus on soil physical structures in sand dunes［J］.Aeolian Research，2014，13：81-89.
8	Zhou X B， Zhang Y M， Yin B F.Divergence in physiological responses between cyanobacterial and lichen crusts to a gradient of simulated nitrogen deposition［J］.Plant and Soil，2016，399（1）：121-134.
9	Sinsabaugh R L， Ebelnap J， Erudgers J，et al.Soil microbial responses to nitrogen addition in arid ecosystems［J］.Frontiers in Microbiology，2015，6：819.
10	Zheng J L， Peng C R， Li H，et al.The role of non-rainfall water on physiological activation in desert biological soil crusts［J］.Journal of Hydrology，2018，556：790-799.
11	Strong C L， Bullard J E， Burford M A，et al.Response of cyanobacterial soil crusts to moisture and nutrient availability［J］.Catena，2013，109：195-202.
12	Chen L， Xie Z， Hu Z，et al.Chenet al.Man-made desert algal crusts as affected by environmental factors in Inner Mongolia，China［J］.Journal of Arid Environments，2006，67：521-527.
13	Chock T， Antoninka A J， Faist A M，et al.Responses of biological soil crusts to rehabilitation strategies［J］.Journal of Arid Environments，2019，163：77-85.
14	Lan S B， Wu L， Zhang D L，et al.Effects of drought and salt stresses on man-made cyanobacterial crusts［J］.European Journal of Soil Biology，2010，46（6）：381-386.
15	周晓兵，张丙昌，张元明.生物土壤结皮固沙理论与实践［J］.中国沙漠，2021，41（1）：164-173.
16	Felde V J M N L， Chamizo S， Felix-Henningsen P，et al.What stabilizes biological soil crusts in the Negev Desert？［J］.Plant and Soil，2018，429（1/2）：9-18.
17	Hui R， Zhao R M， Liu L V，et al.Changes in winter snow depth affects photosynthesis and physiological characteristics of biological soil crusts in the Tengger Desert［J］.Photosynthetica，2018，56（4）：1304-1312.
18	陶玲，杜昊霖，张文杰，等.苔藓结皮复配凹凸棒基高吸水性固沙材料的生理特性［J］.中国沙漠，2018，38（4）：823-828.
19	Park C H， Li X R， Jia R L，et al.Combined application of cyanobacteria with soil fixing chemicals for rapid induction of biological soil crust formation［J］.Arid Land Research and Management，2017，31（1）：81-93.
20	Zhao R M， Hui R， Wang Z R，et al.Winter snowfall can have a positive effect on photosynthetic carbon fixation and biomass accumulation of biological soil crusts from the Gurbantunggut Desert，China［J］.Ecological Research，2016，31（2）：251-262.
21	Hui R， Li X R， Chen C Y，et al.Responses of photosynthetic properties and chloroplast ultrastructure of Bryum argenteum from a desert biological soil crust to elevated ultraviolet-bradiation［J］.Physiologia Plantarum，2013，147（4）：489-501.
22	Wang W B， Wang Y C， Shu X，et al.Physiological responses of soil crust-forming cyanobacteria to diurnal temperature variation［J］.Journal of Basic Microbiology，2013，53（1）：72-80.
23	Tao L， Ren H R， Ren J.Assessment of cultured media for desert moss crust by physiological responses［J］.Journal of Basic Microbiology，2021，61（2）：157-164.
24	Bu C F， Wang C， Yang Y L，et al.Physiological responses of artificial moss biocrusts to dehydration-rehydration process and heat stress on the Loess Plateau，China［J］.Journal of Arid Land，2017，9（3）：419-431.
25	Szyja M， Büdel B， Colesie C.Ecophysiological characterization of early successional biological soil crusts in heavily human-impacted areas［J］.Biogeosciences，2018，15（7）：1919-1931.
26	Rao B Q， Liu Y D， Lan S B，et al.Effects of sand burial stress on the early developments of cyanobacterial crusts in the field［J］.European Journal of Soil Biology，2011，48：48-55.
27	Ma G F， Ran F T， Feng E K，et al.Preparation and properties of an organic-inorganic composite superabsorbent based on attapulgite［J］.Journal of Composite Materials，2016，50（14）：1865-1874.
28	Shi S L， Zhang H R， Huang C，et al.Purification of lignocellulose hydrolysate by Org-Attapulgite （Divinyl Benzene-StyreneMethyl acrylate） composite adsorbent［J］.Bioresources，2016，11（4）：8664-8675.
29	陶玲，曹田，吕莹，等.生物型凹凸棒基高分子固沙材料的复配效果［J］.中国沙漠，2017，37（2）：276-280.
30	Wu Y W， Rao B Q， Wu P P，et al.Development of artificially induced biological soil crusts in fields and their effects on top soil［J］.Plant and Soil，2013，370（1/2）：115-124.
31	张甜，贾荣亮，高艳红，等.沙坡头人工固沙植被演替过程中主要结皮生物生态位和种间关联变化特征［J］.中国沙漠，2021，41（4）：100-108.
32	吴丽，陈晓国，张高科，等.人工生物结皮的发育演替及表土持水特性研究［J］.环境科学，2014，35（3）：1138-1143.
33	Wang J， Bao J T， Su J Q，et al.Impact of inorganic nitrogen additions on microbes in biological soil crusts［J］.Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2015，88：303-313.
34	黄文福，刘左军，单夕文，等.土壤基质、湿度及接种量对荒漠藻结皮形成的影响［J］.中国沙漠，2014，34（6）：1503-1508.
35	Zhao Y， Li X R， Zhang Z S，et al.Biological soil crusts influence carbon release responses following rainfall in a temperate desert，northern China［J］.Ecological Research，2014，29（5）：889-896.

变异来源	df	F	P
生物型固沙材料	2	129.8	<0.001
接种时间	2	69.40	<0.001
交互作用	4	167.7	<0.001

变异来源	df	F	P
生物型固沙材料	2	129.8	<0.001
接种时间	2	69.40	<0.001
交互作用	4	167.7	<0.001

材料编号	培养天数/d				F值
材料编号	20	40	60	80	F值
BSM31	0.180±0.003^Ab	0.184±0.004^Ab	0.196±0.004^Ac	0.127±0.068^Bc	8.24^*
BSM21	0.188±0.001^b	0.194±0.001^b	0.202±0.001^c	0.213±0.001^b	3.45
BSM11	0.203±0.002^Ba	0.218±0.001^ABa	0.247±0.006^Ba	0.280±0.008^Aa	8.69^*
BSM10	0.164±0.005^Bb	0.193±0.008^Ab	0.202±0.001^Ac	0.204±0.001^Ab	8.56^*
BSM12	0.195±0.003^Cb	0.214±0.001^Ba	0.218±0.005^ABb	0.228±0.001^Ab	9.78^**
BSM13	0.191±0.002^Cb	0.208±0.001^Ba	0.215±0.001^Bb	0.225±0.001^Ab	9.32^*
F值	6.98^*	10.24^**	9.34^**	8.56^*

材料编号	培养天数/d				F值
材料编号	20	40	60	80	F值
BSM31	0.180±0.003^Ab	0.184±0.004^Ab	0.196±0.004^Ac	0.127±0.068^Bc	8.24^*
BSM21	0.188±0.001^b	0.194±0.001^b	0.202±0.001^c	0.213±0.001^b	3.45
BSM11	0.203±0.002^Ba	0.218±0.001^ABa	0.247±0.006^Ba	0.280±0.008^Aa	8.69^*
BSM10	0.164±0.005^Bb	0.193±0.008^Ab	0.202±0.001^Ac	0.204±0.001^Ab	8.56^*
BSM12	0.195±0.003^Cb	0.214±0.001^Ba	0.218±0.005^ABb	0.228±0.001^Ab	9.78^**
BSM13	0.191±0.002^Cb	0.208±0.001^Ba	0.215±0.001^Bb	0.225±0.001^Ab	9.32^*
F值	6.98^*	10.24^**	9.34^**	8.56^*

培养天数/d	变异来源	df	F值	P
20	水分	2	12.85	<0.001
	营养	2	29.47	<0.001
	水分×营养	4	16.79	<0.001
40	水分	2	19.86	<0.001
	营养	2	45.62	<0.001
	水分×营养	4	17.97	<0.001
60	水分	2	36.25	<0.001
	营养	2	17.89	<0.001
	水分×营养	4	123.45	<0.001
80	水分	2	42.35	<0.001
	营养	2	51.26	<0.001
	水分×营养	4	15.68	<0.001